JIN uses a double-blind peer review process. The editorial office removes identifying information before sending manuscripts to a minimum of three peer reviewers via Editorial Manager, where reviewers provide feedback and a publication recommendation:
The editor makes the final publication decision based on peer feedback and editorial office review. Authors receive de-identified reviewer recommendations along with editorial comments.
Reviewers conduct a section-by-section assessment covering:
New reviewers receive a detailed guideline document upon acceptance to the reviewer pool.
Reviewers conduct a section-by-section assessment covering:
New reviewers receive a detailed guideline document upon acceptance to the reviewer pool.
Peer reviewers help uphold the accuracy and clinical relevance of published research while advancing their own professional development. Benefits include:
Peer reviewers help uphold the accuracy and clinical relevance of published research while advancing their own professional development. Benefits include: